Přehled
Rozsudek
SECOND SECTION
CASE OF DUYMAZ AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 58437/17 and 313 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
25 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Duymaz and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Lorraine Schembri Orland,
Frédéric Krenc, judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 4 June 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).
2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that the majority of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.
3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating pre-trial detention.
6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.
7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 118-21, 3 March 2020, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑195), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§ 102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).
10. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). At this juncture, it cannot be maintained, as the Government argued in their observations, that the fact that the applicants were not members of the judiciary had any bearing on the conclusion reached. Moreover, while the Government commented that the applicants in applications nos. 61564/19, 2841/20 and 22465/19 had actively participated in the failed coup attempt or had been arrested while attempting to leave the country, the Court observes that no such findings were made in the initial detention orders with respect to these applicants. It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
- OTHER COMPLAINTS
11. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
12. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
13. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
14. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;
- Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;
- Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 48400/19, 49703/19, 49910/19, 62956/19, 1615/20, 4397/20, 9639/20, 11997/20, 13673/20, 22973/20, 30443/20, 34186/20, 38467/20, 16538/21 and 16895/21, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
- Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases:
No. | Application no. | Case name | Lodged on | Applicant | Represented by |
1. | 58437/17 | Duymaz v. Türkiye | 12/07/2017 | Mehmet DUYMAZ | Mustafa UYSAL |
2. | 58438/17 | Dorum v. Türkiye | 10/07/2017 | İsmail DORUM | Mustafa UYSAL |
3. | 58439/17 | Öz v. Türkiye | 12/07/2017 | Nuri ÖZ | Mustafa UYSAL |
4. | 58452/17 | Çipil v. Türkiye | 24/07/2017 | Yavuz ÇİPİL | Mustafa UYSAL |
5. | 58454/17 | Reis v. Türkiye | 21/07/2017 | Selçuk REİS | Mustafa UYSAL |
6. | 58456/17 | Tekin v. Türkiye | 17/07/2017 | Hamdi TEKİN | Gülhis YÖRÜK |
7. | 60995/17 | Bostan v. Türkiye | 31/07/2017 | Hasan BOSTAN | Mustafa UYSAL |
8. | 80976/17 | Aksan v. Türkiye | 09/11/2017 | Hüseyin AKSAN | Şule GÖKMEN |
9. | 82731/17 | Yıldırım v. Türkiye | 31/10/2017 | Hakan YILDIRIM | Gülhis YÖRÜK |
10. | 82739/17 | Keleş v. Türkiye | 03/11/2017 | Savaş KELEŞ | Gülhis YÖRÜK |
11. | 20497/18 | Üner v. Türkiye | 10/04/2018 | Mustafa ÜNER | Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ |
12. | 27945/18 | Mete v. Türkiye | 30/05/2018 | Sami METE | Dilara YILMAZ |
13. | 30186/18 | Öztürk v. Türkiye | 20/06/2018 | Akif ÖZTÜRK | Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU |
14. | 32959/18 | Durdu v. Türkiye | 03/07/2018 | Raşit DURDU | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
15. | 32981/18 | Saka v. Türkiye | 03/07/2018 | Sabri SAKA | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
16. | 47192/18 | Gülen v. Türkiye | 02/10/2018 | Pınar GÜLEN | Havva ALAN ÖZCEL |
17. | 15792/19 | Gürel v. Türkiye | 11/03/2019 | Ahmet GÜREL | Dilara YILMAZ |
18. | 16572/19 | Uçar v. Türkiye | 16/03/2019 | Hasan Hüseyin UÇAR | Dilara YILMAZ |
19. | 17512/19 | Arıtürk v. Türkiye | 14/03/2019 | Burhan ARITÜRK | Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU |
20. | 17576/19 | Elma v. Türkiye | 01/03/2019 | Ahmet ELMA | Dilara YILMAZ |
21. | 19178/19 | Atasoy v. Türkiye | 28/03/2019 | Kenan ATASOY | İbrahim Halil UZUN |
22. | 19832/19 | Türkoğlu v. Türkiye | 25/03/2019 | Hakan TÜRKOĞLU | Fatih DİŞCİ |
23. | 22465/19 | Tirit v. Türkiye | 18/04/2019 | Süleyman TİRİT | Özlem SUZAN |
24. | 22489/19 | Kılıç v. Türkiye | 16/04/2019 | Fatih KILIÇ | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
25. | 24839/19 | Küççük v. Türkiye | 03/05/2019 | Mesut KÜÇÇÜK | Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU |
26. | 24953/19 | Şimşek v. Türkiye | 30/04/2019 | Mutlu ŞİMŞEK | Mustafa ALGAM |
27. | 25289/19 | Gülgen v. Türkiye | 22/04/2019 | Cumhur GÜLGEN | Serkan CENGİZ |
28. | 26037/19 | Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye | 23/04/2019 | Fatih KILIÇASLAN | Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU |
29. | 27196/19 | Çetingül v. Türkiye | 10/05/2019 | Fatih ÇETİNGÜL | Nursel AKGÜN |
30. | 27772/19 | Tonga v. Türkiye | 10/05/2019 | Hasan Basri TONGA | Zafer İRAZ |
31. | 29535/19 | Yaşar v. Türkiye | 10/05/2019 | Ramazan YAŞAR | Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU |
32. | 29756/19 | Yoldaş v. Türkiye | 24/05/2019 | İshak YOLDAŞ | Burcu HAS |
33. | 30055/19 | Kadıoğlu v. Türkiye | 31/05/2019 | Dursun Ali KADIOĞLU | Şule GÖKMEN |
34. | 30057/19 | Onat v. Türkiye | 17/05/2019 | Zeliha Gül ONAT | Ayşe Rabia YÜREKLİTÜRK |
35. | 30082/19 | Yerkazanoğlu v. Türkiye | 28/05/2019 | Nevin YERKAZANOĞLU | Havva ALAN ÖZCEL |
36. | 30972/19 | Er v. Türkiye | 31/05/2019 | Mevlüt ER | Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU |
37. | 32207/19 | Zengin v. Türkiye | 10/06/2019 | Raşit ZENGİN | Nursel AKGÜN |
38. | 32265/19 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 03/06/2019 | İbrahim AYDIN | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
39. | 34245/19 | Köksal v. Türkiye | 18/06/2019 | Bayram KÖKSAL | Burcu HAS |
40. | 35131/19 | Altıntaş v. Türkiye | 21/06/2019 | Sezgin ALTINTAŞ | |
41. | 35260/19 | Yüce v. Türkiye | 27/06/2019 | Ali YÜCE | Uğur ALTUN |
42. | 35481/19 | Ünsal v. Türkiye | 06/05/2019 | Zafer ÜNSAL | Fatih DÖNMEZ |
43. | 35989/19 | YILDIZ v. Türkiye | 21/06/2019 | Turgut YILDIZ | İbrahim Halil UZUN |
44. | 36066/19 | Apa v. Türkiye | 21/06/2019 | Salih APA | İbrahim Halil UZUN |
45. | 36190/19 | ErYILMAZ v. Türkiye | 21/06/2019 | Ali ERYILMAZ | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
46. | 37100/19 | Çetin v. Türkiye | 26/06/2019 | Ali Rıza ÇETİN | Fatih DİŞCİ |
47. | 37240/19 | Özbey v. Türkiye | 20/06/2019 | Yusuf ÖZBEY | Necip Fazıl YILDIZ |
48. | 37253/19 | Yanbay v. Türkiye | 13/06/2019 | Ahmet YANBAY | Ahmet Sami GÜLŞEN |
49. | 37276/19 | Köse v. Türkiye | 09/07/2019 | İbrahim KÖSE | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
50. | 37619/19 | Baş v. Türkiye | 04/07/2019 | Ali BAŞ | Mustafa AÇICI |
51. | 38696/19 | Polat v. Türkiye | 05/07/2019 | Abdullah POLAT | Havva NALBANT TEKİN |
52. | 40185/19 | Duman v. Türkiye | 17/07/2019 | Çetin DUMAN | Dilara YILMAZ |
53. | 40393/19 | Aslan v. Türkiye | 19/07/2019 | Alper ASLAN | İbrahim KOCAOĞUL |
54. | 40635/19 | Turan v. Türkiye | 22/07/2019 | Bünyamin Cüneyt TURAN | Dilara YILMAZ |
55. | 40692/19 | Arıcan v. Türkiye | 19/07/2019 | Osman Serhat ARICAN | Tuğba ARICAN |
56. | 40804/19 | Bayraktar v. Türkiye | 17/07/2019 | Nilüfer BAYRAKTAR | Dilara YILMAZ |
57. | 40813/19 | Büyükemirusta v. Türkiye | 28/07/2019 | Hilmi BÜYÜKEMİRUSTA | Tarık AVŞAR |
58. | 40940/19 | Tunahan v. Türkiye | 23/07/2019 | Tarık TUNAHAN | Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY |
59. | 41212/19 | Ertaş v. Türkiye | 03/07/2019 | Fatih ERTAŞ | Fatih DİŞCİ |
60. | 41299/19 | Gürler v. Türkiye | 26/07/2019 | Aziz GÜRLER | Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ |
61. | 41659/19 | Acar v. Türkiye | 27/06/2019 | Ahmet ACAR | Fatih DİŞCİ |
62. | 41699/19 | Böken v. Türkiye | 16/07/2019 | Ali Ahmet BÖKEN | Erşan CANSEVEN |
63. | 41779/19 | Satık v. Türkiye | 02/08/2019 | Ömer SATIK | |
64. | 42047/19 | Dağ v. Türkiye | 01/08/2019 | İsmail DAĞ | Şule GÖKMEN |
65. | 42089/19 | Bülbül v. Türkiye | 29/07/2019 | Arslan BÜLBÜL | Hasan Önder SULU |
66. | 42156/19 | Daşkın v. Türkiye | 26/07/2019 | Fatih DAŞKIN | Elif KATI |
67. | 42540/19 | Türkaydın v. Türkiye | 06/08/2019 | Kadir TÜRKAYDIN | Ufuk Sami HAKVERDİ |
68. | 42869/19 | Acar v. Türkiye | 05/08/2019 | Özkan ACAR | Şule GÖKMEN |
69. | 43361/19 | Ulun v. Türkiye | 06/08/2019 | Fatih Sait ULUN | Vasfiye ULUN |
70. | 43388/19 | Onat v. Türkiye | 02/08/2019 | Hasan Gürhan ONAT | Zafer Asım SERBEST |
71. | 43407/19 | Akarsu v. Türkiye | 07/08/2019 | Üzeyir AKARSU | Bekir DÖNMEZ |
72. | 43422/19 | Eryaman v. Türkiye | 21/07/2019 | Metin ERYAMAN | Firdevs ERYAMAN |
73. | 44990/19 | Aktepe v. Türkiye | 23/08/2019 | Basri AKTEPE | Halil Melih AKTEPE |
74. | 44993/19 | Demirbaş v. Türkiye | 23/08/2019 | Salim DEMİRBAŞ | Osman TABU |
75. | 45864/19 | Ateş v. Türkiye | 29/08/2019 | Onur ATEŞ | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
76. | 46150/19 | Urbay v. Türkiye | 31/08/2019 | Osman URBAY | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
77. | 46772/19 | ŞAHİN v. Türkiye | 26/08/2019 | Fatih ŞAHİN | Fatih DÖNMEZ |
78. | 47943/19 | Çelik v. Türkiye | 21/08/2019 | Zafer ÇELİK | Naim UZUN |
79. | 48063/19 | Moran v. Türkiye | 05/09/2019 | Rukiye MORAN | Burak ÇAĞ |
80. | 48104/19 | Bayzan v. Türkiye | 11/09/2019 | Murat BAYZAN | İsmail KAPLAN |
81. | 48359/19 | Taner v. Türkiye | 02/09/2019 | Ayşe TANER | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
82. | 48400/19 | Aksoy v. Türkiye | 11/09/2019 | Erkan AKSOY | Esra AKSOY |
83. | 48552/19 | Bavik v. Türkiye | 20/05/2019 | Selahattin BAVİK | Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ |
84. | 49211/19 | Karanfil v. Türkiye | 29/08/2019 | Remzi KARANFİL | Muhammed Nuh POLAT |
85. | 49391/19 | Körpe v. Türkiye | 06/09/2019 | Mustafa KÖRPE | Fatih DİŞCİ |
86. | 49408/19 | Uzun v. Türkiye | 11/09/2019 | Abdullah UZUN | Muhammed Nuh POLAT |
87. | 49703/19 | Gücük v. Türkiye | 10/09/2019 | Mahmut GÜCÜK | Gizem GÜZEL |
88. | 49722/19 | Mertkaya v. Türkiye | 09/09/2019 | Okan MERTKAYA | Bülent ÖNÜR |
89. | 49910/19 | Atabay v. Türkiye | 19/09/2019 | Ulvi Murat ATABAY | Serkan BEN |
90. | 50264/19 | Künç v. Türkiye | 10/09/2019 | Yaşar KÜNÇ | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
91. | 50714/19 | Bayram v. Türkiye | 17/08/2019 | Levent BAYRAM | Ülkü BAYRAM |
92. | 51075/19 | Açar v. Türkiye | 02/09/2019 | Murat AÇAR | Hülya AÇAR |
93. | 51206/19 | Gedikli v. Türkiye | 03/09/2019 | Abdullah GEDİKLİ | Esra Nur AKYOL |
94. | 51415/19 | Kulaksiz v. Türkiye | 23/09/2019 | Şenol KULAKSIZ | Burcu HAS |
95. | 51491/19 | Çoban v. Türkiye | 27/08/2019 | Ahmet ÇOBAN | Tahir EREN |
96. | 51794/19 | Yıldırım v. Türkiye | 29/08/2019 | Burhan YILDIRIM | Meryem GÜNAY |
97. | 52109/19 | Elmas v. Türkiye | 23/09/2019 | Leyla ELMAS | Burcu HAS |
98. | 53526/19 | Yıldırım v. Türkiye | 26/09/2019 | Mehmet Akif YILDIRIM | Numan YILDIRIM |
99. | 53571/19 | Hancıoğlu v. Türkiye | 09/10/2019 | Davut HANCIOĞLU | Özlem SUZAN |
100. | 53673/19 | Zincirkıran v. Türkiye | 30/09/2019 | Mevlüt ZİNCİRKIRAN | Ali ÇİTİL |
101. | 53735/19 | Tekin v. Türkiye | 26/09/2019 | Salih TEKİN | Yunus Emre DOĞAN |
102. | 54004/19 | Doğan v. Türkiye | 04/09/2019 | Selçuk DOĞAN | Samet YILMAZ |
103. | 54136/19 | Osmanoğlu v. Türkiye | 30/09/2019 | Ayhan OSMANOĞLU | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
104. | 54144/19 | Cantaş v. Türkiye | 02/10/2019 | Cengiz CANTAŞ | İbrahim KOCAOĞUL |
105. | 54800/19 | Aksoy v. Türkiye | 05/10/2019 | Özcan AKSOY | Serhat ŞAHİN |
106. | 54823/19 | Yurdalan v. Türkiye | 14/10/2019 | Muhammet YURDALAN | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
107. | 55613/19 | Koç v. Türkiye | 24/09/2019 | Murat KOÇ | Bekir DEMİRCİOĞLU |
108. | 55767/19 | Yalın v. Türkiye | 04/10/2019 | İlhan YALIN | Zerrin YALIN |
109. | 56434/19 | Erden v. Türkiye | 18/10/2019 | Süleyman ERDEN | Tarık AVŞAR |
110. | 56477/19 | Kocaman v. Türkiye | 15/10/2019 | Muharrem KOCAMAN | Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ |
111. | 56884/19 | Şatıroğlu v. Türkiye | 17/10/2019 | Samet ŞATIROĞLU | Nurcan BÜYÜKÇINAR |
112. | 57057/19 | Yurtcu v. Türkiye | 25/10/2019 | Ahmet YURTÇU | Enes KABADAYI |
113. | 57349/19 | Şekerci v. Türkiye | 18/10/2019 | Talat ŞEKERCİ | Burhan Temel ÇINAR |
114. | 57465/19 | Karalı v. Türkiye | 23/10/2019 | Ümit KARALI | İbrahim Alper CAN |
115. | 57479/19 | Küçükbaşol v. Türkiye | 22/10/2019 | Şuayip KÜÇÜKBAŞOL | Zafer İRAZ |
116. | 57668/19 | Sahin v. Türkiye | 15/10/2019 | Harun SAHİN | Fatih DÖNMEZ |
117. | 57763/19 | Sert v. Türkiye | 04/11/2019 | Tuncay SERT | Mehmet TUNÇER |
118. | 58097/19 | Tekkoyun v. Türkiye | 11/10/2019 | Mesut TEKKOYUN | İbrahim KOCAOĞUL |
119. | 58124/19 | İldemir v. Türkiye | 30/10/2019 | Emre İLDEMİR | Şule GÖKMEN |
120. | 59151/19 | Solmaz v. Türkiye | 08/11/2019 | İbrahim SOLMAZ | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
121. | 59927/19 | Birkin v. Türkiye | 06/11/2019 | Murat BİRKİN | Rana BİRKİN |
122. | 61212/19 | Kaplan v. Türkiye | 23/11/2019 | Muhammed KAPLAN | Bekir Gökhan ÖZTÜRK |
123. | 61247/19 | Manas v. Türkiye | 20/11/2019 | Mustafa MANAS | Tarık AVŞAR |
124. | 61564/19 | Sarı v. Türkiye | 20/11/2019 | Abdulkadir SARI | Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL |
125. | 61582/19 | Sefil v. Türkiye | 11/11/2019 | Yusuf SEFİL | Hatice SEFİL |
126. | 61597/19 | Bostan v. Türkiye | 13/11/2019 | Necati BOSTAN | Arzu BEYAZİT |
127. | 61634/19 | Özkan v. Türkiye | 08/11/2019 | Mehmet ÖZKAN | Fatma ÖZKAN |
128. | 61662/19 | Akyürek v. Türkiye | 11/11/2019 | Mehmet Fatih AKYÜREK | Özgür Devran ÜNEŞİ |
129. | 61893/19 | Çoban v. Türkiye | 15/11/2019 | Mehmet Şirin ÇOBAN | Nilay NAYMAN |
130. | 62030/19 | Dogan v. Türkiye | 19/11/2019 | Hasan DOĞAN | Uğur ALTUN |
131. | 62378/19 | Doğman v. Türkiye | 18/11/2019 | Ali İhsan DOĞMAN | Dilara YILMAZ |
132. | 62623/19 | Dişlen v. Türkiye | 18/11/2019 | Mustafa DİŞLEN | Fatma Zarif TUNÇ |
133. | 62956/19 | Işık v. Türkiye | 19/11/2019 | Ayhan IŞIK | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
134. | 63023/19 | Ökmen v. Türkiye | 14/11/2019 | Mustafa ÖKMEN | İrem TATLIDEDE |
135. | 63516/19 | Çelebi v. Türkiye | 18/11/2019 | Serkan ÇELEBİ | Cihat ÇITIR |
136. | 64029/19 | Koçtürk v. Türkiye | 09/12/2019 | Uğur KOÇTÜRK | Nursel AKGÜN |
137. | 64892/19 | Dinç v. Türkiye | 26/11/2019 | İlker DİNÇ | Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA |
138. | 64941/19 | Kuğu v. Türkiye | 06/12/2019 | Bilgin KUĞU | Esad MEMİŞ |
139. | 65111/19 | Topatmış v. Türkiye | 03/12/2019 | Cengiz TOPATMIŞ | Adnan ERDOĞAN |
140. | 65223/19 | Senğül v. Türkiye | 18/12/2019 | Yavuz SENĞÜL | Cemaynur GÜVEN |
141. | 119/20 | Yüksel v. Türkiye | 19/12/2019 | İsmail YÜKSEL | Mustafa ALGAM |
142. | 125/20 | YILMAZ v. Türkiye | 19/12/2019 | Burak Yasin YILMAZ | Mustafa ALGAM |
143. | 627/20 | Ersöz v. Türkiye | 23/12/2019 | Süleyman ERSÖZ | Sezgin ÖZDEMİR |
144. | 1156/20 | Şen v. Türkiye | 17/12/2019 | Yavuz ŞEN | Çiğdem ŞEN |
145. | 1265/20 | Uzunali v. Türkiye | 20/12/2019 | Erdinç UZUNALİ | Zafer İRAZ |
146. | 1398/20 | Danışman v. Türkiye | 27/12/2019 | Abdullah Mutlu DANIŞMAN | Mahir ORAK |
147. | 1615/20 | Ayverdi v. Türkiye | 13/12/2019 | Ferdi AYVERDİ | Mustafa Safa SOYDAN |
148. | 2126/20 | Şahan v. Türkiye | 02/01/2020 | Mehmet ŞAHAN | Fatma ŞAHAN |
149. | 2194/20 | Demir v. Türkiye | 19/12/2019 | Vedat DEMİR | Suphi Uğur ÇÖREKÇİ |
150. | 2465/20 | Özcan v. Türkiye | 06/01/2020 | Özgür ÖZCAN | Ömer Tarık ORMANCI |
151. | 2523/20 | Uysal v. Türkiye | 19/12/2019 | Erdoğan UYSAL | Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ |
152. | 2567/20 | Kınık v. Türkiye | 26/12/2019 | Özden KINIK | Erşan CANSEVEN |
153. | 2841/20 | Altınova v. Türkiye | 04/12/2019 | Suat ALTINOVA | İsmail CAN |
154. | 3578/20 | Erkart v. Türkiye | 30/12/2019 | Yusuf ERKART | Mustafa ÖZEL |
155. | 4193/20 | Sayılı v. Türkiye | 03/01/2020 | Hasan SAYILI | Erşan CANSEVEN |
156. | 4397/20 | Sağıroğlu v. Türkiye | 31/12/2019 | Mustafa SAĞIROĞLU | Halil İbrahim TURAN |
157. | 4639/20 | Elibol v. Türkiye | 15/01/2020 | Mehmet Emre ELİBOL | Kamile ÖZBULUT |
158. | 4812/20 | Gazioğlu v. Türkiye | 03/01/2020 | Aynur GAZİOĞLU | Fatih DİŞCİ |
159. | 5030/20 | Öztürk v. Türkiye | 10/01/2020 | Seydi Vakkas ÖZTÜRK | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
160. | 5508/20 | Yaman v. Türkiye | 20/01/2020 | Oğuz YAMAN | Yasemin YAMAN |
161. | 6082/20 | Aytaç v. Türkiye | 24/01/2020 | Burak AYTAÇ | Ahmet Alp AYTAÇ |
162. | 6278/20 | Yücetürk v. Türkiye | 21/01/2020 | Ramazan YÜCETÜRK | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
163. | 6830/20 | Tıknas v. Türkiye | 21/01/2020 | Tufan TIKNAS | Metehan USLUEROL |
164. | 6915/20 | Akkuş v. Türkiye | 21/01/2020 | Murat AKKUŞ | Metehan USLUEROL |
165. | 6920/20 | Şahan v. Türkiye | 16/01/2020 | Ferit ŞAHAN | Metehan USLUEROL |
166. | 7134/20 | Uçan v. Türkiye | 13/01/2020 | Engin UÇAN | Hüseyin UÇAN |
167. | 7857/20 | Safaz v. Türkiye | 27/01/2020 | İsmail SAFAZ | Enes Bahadır BAŞKÖY |
168. | 7900/20 | Abidik v. Türkiye | 29/01/2020 | Adem Ali ABİDİK | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
169. | 7903/20 | Topoğlu v. Türkiye | 03/02/2020 | Serhat TOPOĞLU | Refia TAŞCIOĞLU |
170. | 8082/20 | Gündüz v. Türkiye | 22/01/2020 | Fatih GÜNDÜZ | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
171. | 8087/20 | Koçer v. Türkiye | 22/01/2020 | Niyazi KOÇER | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
172. | 8097/20 | Şeker v. Türkiye | 29/01/2020 | Adem ŞEKER | Metehan USLUEROL |
173. | 9268/20 | Oluç v. Türkiye | 03/02/2020 | Rıdvan OLUÇ | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
174. | 9353/20 | Uzun v. Türkiye | 17/12/2019 | Cem UZUN | Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA |
175. | 9639/20 | Altan v. Türkiye | 05/02/2020 | Bayram ALTAN | Bedirhan Tuna YILDIZ |
176. | 9986/20 | Orta v. Türkiye | 18/02/2020 | Hüseyin ORTA | Beyhan ORTA |
177. | 11014/20 | Yavaşcan v. Türkiye | 17/02/2020 | Yusuf YAVAŞCAN | Handan YAVAŞCAN MARHAN |
178. | 11221/20 | Birişik v. Türkiye | 10/02/2020 | Muhammed BİRİŞİK | Faik BİRİŞİK |
179. | 11302/20 | Güler v. Türkiye | 18/02/2020 | Ramazan GÜLER | Burak ÇAĞ |
180. | 11476/20 | Özdemir v. Türkiye | 18/02/2020 | Ergün ÖZDEMİR | Hatice ÖZDEMİR |
181. | 11695/20 | Özder v. Türkiye | 27/02/2020 | İsmail ÖZDER | Havva ALAN ÖZCEL |
182. | 11997/20 | Ak v. Türkiye | 18/02/2020 | Ayhan AK | Ersayın İŞIK |
183. | 12646/20 | Yamaç v. Türkiye | 28/02/2020 | Mustafa YAMAÇ | Mehmet TUNÇER |
184. | 12671/20 | Gürzal v. Türkiye | 21/02/2020 | Ergün GÜRZAL | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
185. | 12898/20 | Özdamar v. Türkiye | 04/03/2020 | Yusuf Kürşad ÖZDAMAR | Arzu ÖZDAMAR |
186. | 13112/20 | Akyazı v. Türkiye | 20/02/2020 | Cengiz AKYAZI | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
187. | 13673/20 | İnce v. Türkiye | 07/03/2020 | Mustafa İNCE | Salim Serdar YAĞCI |
188. | 13760/20 | Tandoğan v. Türkiye | 25/02/2020 | Nuh TANDOĞAN | Uğur ALTUN |
189. | 14844/20 | Genç v. Türkiye | 06/03/2020 | Mehmet Zeki GENÇ | Mehmet SATICI |
190. | 15852/20 | Çelik v. Türkiye | 16/03/2020 | Hasan ÇELİK | Cihat ÇITIR |
191. | 16207/20 | Özdemir v. Türkiye | 16/03/2020 | Mehmet ÖZDEMİR | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
192. | 16561/20 | Arıcan v. Türkiye | 18/03/2020 | Ahmet ARICAN | Muhammet Emin ÇITIR |
193. | 16933/20 | Çakmak v. Türkiye | 23/03/2020 | Çağrı ÇAKMAK | Mustafa YELBEY |
194. | 16996/20 | Tezcan v. Türkiye | 20/03/2020 | Abdulgani TEZCAN | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
195. | 17040/20 | Kaya v. Türkiye | 17/03/2020 | Ahmet Hamdi KAYA | Eyyüp SAĞIR |
196. | 17065/20 | Varol v. Türkiye | 03/04/2020 | Selim VAROL | |
197. | 17119/20 | Akkuş v. Türkiye | 20/03/2020 | Necati AKKUŞ | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
198. | 17120/20 | Tezel v. Türkiye | 09/04/2020 | Aykut TEZEL | Özge KIYAK MUSAN |
199. | 17122/20 | Erşen v. Türkiye | 24/03/2020 | Mahmut Sami ERŞEN | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
200. | 17981/20 | Dağdelen v. Türkiye | 17/04/2020 | Osman DAĞDELEN | Kamile ÖZBULUT |
201. | 18184/20 | Batıhan v. Türkiye | 17/04/2020 | Sümerya BATIHAN | Demir ABDULSELAM |
202. | 20148/20 | Kaplan v. Türkiye | 13/05/2020 | Ahmet KAPLAN | Alperen AKARSLAN |
203. | 20245/20 | Mıhcı v. Türkiye | 13/05/2020 | Doğan MIHCI | Erşan CANSEVEN |
204. | 21059/20 | Kaya v. Türkiye | 22/05/2020 | Turgut KAYA | Hamide Nur ALKAÇ |
205. | 21333/20 | Mermer v. Türkiye | 11/05/2020 | Faruk MERMER | Can AHMETOĞLU |
206. | 21417/20 | Kaya v. Türkiye | 20/05/2020 | Murat KAYA | Muhammet ERDEN |
207. | 21743/20 | Karaca v. Türkiye | 28/05/2020 | Ayhan KARACA | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
208. | 21969/20 | Demir v. Türkiye | 29/05/2020 | Sabri DEMİR | Çiğdem ÇALIŞ ÇAĞAN |
209. | 22427/20 | Kök v. Türkiye | 02/06/2020 | Mustafa Önder KÖK | Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKIÇOĞLU |
210. | 22973/20 | Aymak v. Türkiye | 21/05/2020 | Bilal AYMAK | Adnan DEMİR |
211. | 23607/20 | Sipahioğlu v. Türkiye | 02/06/2020 | Rıfat SİPAHİOĞLU | Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ |
212. | 23886/20 | Aytekin v. Türkiye | 21/05/2020 | Mehmet Ertaç AYTEKİN | Özkan OGURLU |
213. | 23990/20 | Obur v. Türkiye | 01/06/2020 | Özlem OBUR | Metin BOZKURT |
214. | 24254/20 | Eroğlu v. Türkiye | 15/06/2020 | Abdurrahman EROĞLU | Uğur ALTUN |
215. | 24293/20 | Yaman v. Türkiye | 15/06/2020 | Bilal YAMAN | Gülsüm YAMAN |
216. | 24308/20 | Karabiber v. Türkiye | 11/06/2020 | Fatih KARABİBER | Serdar ATILGAN |
217. | 24401/20 | Uysal v. Türkiye | 01/06/2020 | Esma Nur UYSAL | Metin BOZKURT |
218. | 25270/20 | Taşkın v. Türkiye | 05/06/2020 | Ferhat TAŞKIN | Fatih DÖNMEZ |
219. | 25463/20 | Karanfil v. Türkiye | 09/06/2020 | Ümmühan KARANFİL | Burcu HAS |
220. | 26395/20 | Eroğlu v. Türkiye | 19/06/2020 | Eyüp EROĞLU | Ömer Faruk YAZGELDİ |
221. | 26464/20 | Özülkü v. Türkiye | 22/06/2020 | Abdulkadir ÖZÜLKÜ | Mehmet Sefa DUMAN |
222. | 27189/20 | Akyol v. Türkiye | 26/06/2020 | Abdurrahman AKYOL | Seçkin KESKİN |
223. | 27256/20 | Güller v. Türkiye | 17/06/2020 | Mücahit GÜLLER | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
224. | 27742/20 | Yilmaz v. Türkiye | 22/06/2020 | Hüseyin YILMAZ | Uğur ALTUN |
225. | 28033/20 | Baykan v. Türkiye | 09/06/2020 | Davut BAYKAN | Mesut Enes AKBULUT |
226. | 28759/20 | Korkmaz v. Türkiye | 30/06/2020 | Ahmet KORKMAZ | Burak ÇOLAK |
227. | 28911/20 | Kaçmaz v. Türkiye | 01/07/2020 | Mesut KAÇMAZ | Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL |
228. | 29048/20 | Kuzgun v. Türkiye | 06/07/2020 | Kürşat KUZGUN | Fatma HACIPAŞALIOĞLU |
229. | 29157/20 | Uludağ v. Türkiye | 24/06/2020 | Mustafa Mücahit ULUDAĞ | İsmet ÇELİK |
230. | 29181/20 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 06/07/2020 | Özcan AYDIN | Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL |
231. | 30443/20 | Alp v. Türkiye | 16/07/2020 | Sadık Turan ALP | İlker BOZ |
232. | 30661/20 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 02/07/2020 | Mehmet Sabır AYDIN | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
233. | 31330/20 | Karabacak v. Türkiye | 21/07/2020 | Burhan KARABACAK | Şule GÖKMEN |
234. | 32060/20 | Gündar v. Türkiye | 27/07/2020 | Doğan GÜNDAR | Mustafa YELBEY |
235. | 33806/20 | Tekdemir v. Türkiye | 04/08/2020 | Çetin TEKDEMİR | Dilara YILMAZ |
236. | 34186/20 | Özkaya v. Türkiye | 22/07/2020 | Erdoğan ÖZKAYA | Hande Nur ÖZKAYA |
237. | 34882/20 | Çetin v. Türkiye | 06/07/2020 | Hüseyin ÇETİN | Ebru EKİCİ |
238. | 34892/20 | Çetinkaya v. Türkiye | 10/08/2020 | Mehmet Sait ÇETİNKAYA | Mualla ERCAN |
239. | 35153/20 | Şan v. Türkiye | 27/07/2020 | Ramazan ŞAN | Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ |
240. | 35431/20 | Pilevne v. Türkiye | 27/07/2020 | Murat PİLEVNE | Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ |
241. | 35513/20 | Ceylan v. Türkiye | 28/07/2020 | Zeki CEYLAN | Kubilay TORUN |
242. | 35598/20 | YILDIZ v. Türkiye | 13/08/2020 | Vehbi YILDIZ | Havva ALAN ÖZCEL |
243. | 36489/20 | Akkul v. Türkiye | 28/07/2020 | İbrahim AKKUL | Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ |
244. | 36920/20 | Kartalcık v. Türkiye | 10/08/2020 | Vedat KARTALCIK | |
245. | 37627/20 | Arslanoğlu v. Türkiye | 26/08/2020 | Rafet ARSLANOĞLU | Ramazan DANIŞMAN |
246. | 37810/20 | Yörüklü v. Türkiye | 18/08/2020 | Şaban YÖRÜKLÜ | Ali YILDIZ |
247. | 38208/20 | Akduman v. Türkiye | 28/08/2020 | Mehmet AKDUMAN | Refia TAŞCIOĞLU |
248. | 38467/20 | Yağcı v. Türkiye | 27/08/2020 | Gülşen YAĞCI | Salim Serdar YAĞCI |
249. | 38471/20 | Karınca v. Türkiye | 20/08/2020 | Habibe KARINCA | İshak IŞIK |
250. | 40647/20 | Cirakoglu v. Türkiye | 02/09/2020 | Mehmet ÇIRAKOĞLU | Fatma HACIPAŞALIOĞLU |
251. | 41368/20 | Arlı v. Türkiye | 10/09/2020 | Seyfettin ARLI | Refia TAŞICOĞLU ERBİROL |
252. | 41470/20 | Başpınar v. Türkiye | 10/09/2020 | İsmail BAŞPINAR | Refia TAŞCIOĞLU |
253. | 42543/20 | Kara v. Türkiye | 15/09/2020 | Nevzat KARA | Mehmet TURANTAYLAK |
254. | 43464/20 | Aydın v. Türkiye | 19/09/2020 | Ünal AYDIN | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
255. | 43656/20 | Koç v. Türkiye | 24/09/2020 | Akif KOÇ | Esra KOÇ |
256. | 45338/20 | Ermişoğlu v. Türkiye | 09/10/2020 | Ergun ERMİŞOĞLU | Janset ATİLA |
257. | 46221/20 | Aytaş v. Türkiye | 01/10/2020 | Kaya Mehmet AYTAŞ | Zeliha DERVIŞOĞLU |
258. | 46389/20 | Karaduman v. Türkiye | 08/10/2020 | Mustafa KARADUMAN | Metehan USLUEROL |
259. | 46415/20 | Kahyaoğlu v. Türkiye | 15/10/2020 | Hasan KAHYAOĞLU | Cevat KAHYAOĞLU |
260. | 47619/20 | Bozkurt v. Türkiye | 22/10/2020 | Hasan BOZKURT | Beyza Esma TUNA |
261. | 49561/20 | Dalman v. Türkiye | 27/10/2020 | Cem DALMAN | Metin BOZKURT |
262. | 49848/20 | Azgın v. Türkiye | 04/11/2020 | Mehmet AZGIN | Hasan ARSLAN |
263. | 51357/20 | Demirhan v. Türkiye | 02/11/2020 | Melek DEMİRHAN | Emriye Zerrin TORAMAN |
264. | 52833/20 | Demircan v. Türkiye | 19/11/2020 | Hamza DEMİRCAN | Kadir ÖZTÜRK |
265. | 54974/20 | Aksoy v. Türkiye | 20/11/2020 | Kadir AKSOY | Zafer İRAZ |
266. | 274/21 | Kocatürk v. Türkiye | 15/12/2020 | Kerim KOCATÜRK | Nesibe Betül KOCATÜRK |
267. | 544/21 | Halıcıoğlu v. Türkiye | 14/12/2020 | Mevlüt HALICIOĞLU | Rümeysa DENİZ |
268. | 1121/21 | Dinc v. Türkiye | 09/12/2020 | Yakup DİNÇ | Elvan BAĞ CANBAZ |
269. | 1614/21 | Karataş v. Türkiye | 24/12/2020 | Emre KARATAŞ | Arife ÖZBEK |
270. | 2100/21 | Ayhan v. Türkiye | 16/12/2020 | Sabri AYHAN | Enes Malik KILIÇ |
271. | 2314/21 | Uzbaş v. Türkiye | 29/12/2020 | Ali UZBAŞ | Burcu HAS |
272. | 2522/21 | Çiftdoğan v. Türkiye | 09/12/2020 | Yakup ÇİFTDOĞAN | Kamile ÖZBULUT |
273. | 3085/21 | ŞAHİN v. Türkiye | 28/12/2020 | Akif ŞAHİN | Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ |
274. | 3105/21 | Yiğit v. Türkiye | 15/12/2020 | Ali Galip YİĞİT | Kamile ÖZBULUT |
275. | 4215/21 | Keten v. Türkiye | 08/01/2021 | Yusuf KETEN | Ayşe Süeda ÜNAL |
276. | 6525/21 | Dombaycı v. Türkiye | 20/01/2021 | Fatma DOMBAYCI | Tarık AVŞAR |
277. | 9401/21 | Çalık v. Türkiye | 28/01/2021 | Muhammet Duran ÇALIK | Rukiye COŞGUN |
278. | 10202/21 | Samur v. Türkiye | 04/01/2021 | Aycan SAMUR | İbrahim Halil UZUN |
279. | 10561/21 | Kenger v. Türkiye | 03/02/2021 | Bekir KENGER | Yusuf Sait PEKGÖZ |
280. | 11766/21 | Usun v. Türkiye | 16/02/2021 | Yunus USUN | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
281. | 12512/21 | Demirci v. Türkiye | 11/12/2020 | Abdurrahman DEMİRCİ | Rümeysa DENİZ |
282. | 12612/21 | Bayrak v. Türkiye | 22/01/2021 | Osman BAYRAK | Tarık AVŞAR |
283. | 14364/21 | Özcan v. Türkiye | 12/03/2021 | Erhan ÖZCAN | Uğur ALTUN |
284. | 14385/21 | Tulukçu v. Türkiye | 10/03/2021 | Fatma Rumeysa TULUKÇU | Refia TAŞCIOĞLU |
285. | 14430/21 | Balcı v. Türkiye | 05/03/2021 | Sezer BALCI | Zafer İRAZ |
286. | 15056/21 | Bayram v. Türkiye | 11/03/2021 | Aşir BAYRAM | Eyyüp SAĞIR |
287. | 15557/21 | Efel v. Türkiye | 11/03/2021 | Dudu EFEL | Rümeysa DENİZ |
288. | 16538/21 | Soyoral v. Türkiye | 05/03/2021 | Lokman SOYORAL | ŞAHİN CANGÜLEÇ |
289. | 16706/21 | Bingül v. Türkiye | 11/03/2021 | Aysel BİNGÜL | Kamile ÖZBULUT |
290. | 16895/21 | Özlem v. Türkiye | 04/03/2021 | Sezen ÖZLEM | Yavuzhan VAROL |
291. | 17102/21 | İper v. Türkiye | 12/03/2021 | Yusuf Emre İPER | Tora PEKİN |
292. | 17425/21 | Öztürk v. Türkiye | 19/03/2021 | Mahmut ÖZTÜRK | Cihat ÇITIR |
293. | 17499/21 | Esen v. Türkiye | 29/03/2021 | Ercan ESEN | Janset ATİLA |
294. | 17592/21 | Akgül v. Türkiye | 23/03/2021 | Adem AKGÜL | Nurcan KAYMAZ ÇEKİÇOĞLU |
295. | 17595/21 | Özdemir v. Türkiye | 17/03/2021 | Muhammet ÖZDEMİR | Mehmet EKİNOĞLU |
296. | 17840/21 | Çitekçi v. Türkiye | 23/03/2021 | Mehmet ÇİTEKÇİ | Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ |
297. | 20509/21 | Taşkent v. Türkiye | 14/04/2021 | Nurcan TAŞKENT | Mehmet Sıddık YURTÇİÇEK |
298. | 22343/21 | Erdem v. Türkiye | 21/04/2021 | Mürsel ERDEM | Kadriye Nur AYTAÇ |
299. | 22347/21 | Erçıkdı v. Türkiye | 20/04/2021 | Erdal ERÇIKDI | Mehmet TUNÇER |
300. | 22925/21 | Talaz v. Türkiye | 29/04/2021 | Hüseyin TALAZ | Burcu HAS |
301. | 26910/21 | Yıldırım v. Türkiye | 17/05/2021 | Mahmut Şerif YILDIRIM | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
302. | 27111/21 | Düzenli v. Türkiye | 10/05/2021 | Halim DÜZENLİ | Merve AVCI |
303. | 28991/21 | Hayla v. Türkiye | 24/05/2021 | Hidaye HAYLA | İbrahim KOCAOĞUL |
304. | 30423/21 | Birinci v. Türkiye | 08/06/2021 | Erdoğan BİRİNCİ | Erol GÜNAYDIN |
305. | 30663/21 | Şeker v. Türkiye | 08/06/2021 | Musa ŞEKER | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
306. | 30926/21 | Tiryaki v. Türkiye | 20/05/2021 | Yunus TİRYAKİ | Fatih DÖNMEZ |
307. | 31151/21 | Özdoğan v. Türkiye | 04/06/2021 | Ahmet ÖZDOĞAN | Hilal Tuğçe ŞAHİN |
308. | 33165/21 | Eker v. Türkiye | 04/06/2021 | Turan EKER Bolu | İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU) |
309. | 33343/21 | Serter Özlü v. Türkiye | 10/06/2021 | Zeynep Sacide SERTER ÖZLÜ | Maide ÖZLÜ |
310. | 34556/21 | Aslan v. Türkiye | 25/06/2021 | Sefer ASLAN | Seçkin KESKİN |
311. | 35695/21 | Aslan v. Türkiye | 28/06/2021 | Hanife Rumeysa ASLAN | Zümrüt ŞAHİN |
312. | 39634/21 | Koçyiğit v. Türkiye | 12/07/2021 | Mustafa KOÇYİĞİT | Senem DOĞANOĞLU |
313. | 42984/21 | Ünal v. Türkiye | 20/08/2021 | Kazım ÜNAL | Kadri İNCE |
314. | 48723/21 | İpkin v. Türkiye | 10/09/2021 | Gökhan İPKİN | Erşan CANSEVEN |